Cathy Holmes was quoted in the North County Times (Escondido, CA) in the article “Luxury hotels may encounter trouble if economy dips again.” Cathy discusses the EB-5 immigration program, and its creation of many hotel deals involving Chinese investors.
Stan Gibson was quoted in E-Commerce Times in the article titled "Apple Lengthens Laundry List of Patent Complaints Against Samsung" commenting on the possibility that Apple and Samsung are negotiating a settlement in their patent suit.
Stan Gibson was quoted in the Daily Journal article "Samsung Knocking at Apple’s Door," regarding the patent and trademark infringement case involving Apple and Samsung, and Samsung’s recent motion for reciprocal discovery.
Jim Butler was quoted in the South China Morning Post in the article "’Ultimate’ City for Investors," concerning the attraction Los Angeles holds for bargain-hunting Chinese investors.
Jim Butler was quoted in the Los Angeles Business Journal article "Legislators Telling Hoteliers Which Sheets to Use," discussing a proposed state law that would require hotels to use fitted sheets, in an attempt to reduce the number of injuries obtained by hotel housekeepers.
Stan Gibson was quoted in the Daily Journal article "High Court Affirms Standard for Patents," in reference to the Supreme Court decision against Microsoft.
Stan Gibson was quoted in the Law360 article "Invalidity Must Be Clear and Convincing: High Court," regarding the recent Supreme Court decision affirming a patent infringement verdict against Microsoft.
Rod Berman was quoted in the E-Commerce Times article "i4i Claims Victory for Innovation in SC Ruling Against Microsoft." Rod comments on what the decision means for future patent infringement cases.
An article in The Business Insider on electronic case law referenced Stan Gibson’s paper "Converting Legal and Contract Notices from Paper to Electronic Delivery: a Corporate Counsel Guide."
Stan Gibson was quoted in the Law360 article titled "Inventors Get 1st Dibs on Gov’t-Funded IP: High Court," regarding a recent Supreme Court decision on patent rights in federally funded inventions.