Los Angeles Real Estate Litigation Lawyer Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP Home
Stan Gibson and Greg Cordrey were mentioned in the Southeast Texas Record for representing Landmark Technology in a patent infringement case.
Stan Gibson was quoted in The Recorder in the article, "Koh Says Apple Didn’t Prove Need for Injunction," regarding the ongoing battle over patents between Apple and Samsung. This article was also reprinted by Corporate Counsel.
JMBM is featured in the August 2011 issue of the ABA Journal in the article, “Wine Time: A Firm Finds Common Interests on the Vine.” The article discusses the passion for wine that exists at the firm, and the camaraderie that it fosters between attorneys and with clients. Bruce Jeffer and Stan Gibson are quoted.
Stan Gibson and Greg Cordrey were mentioned in the Southeast Texas Record for representing Landmark Technology in a recent patent infringement case.
Stan Gibson was quoted in E-Commerce Times in the article titled "Apple Lengthens Laundry List of Patent Complaints Against Samsung" commenting on the possibility that Apple and Samsung are negotiating a settlement in their patent suit.
Stan Gibson was quoted in the Daily Journal article "Samsung Knocking at Apple’s Door," regarding the patent and trademark infringement case involving Apple and Samsung, and Samsung’s recent motion for reciprocal discovery.
Stan Gibson was quoted in the Daily Journal article "High Court Affirms Standard for Patents," in reference to the Supreme Court decision against Microsoft.
Stan Gibson was quoted in the Law360 article "Invalidity Must Be Clear and Convincing: High Court," regarding the recent Supreme Court decision affirming a patent infringement verdict against Microsoft.
An article in The Business Insider on electronic case law referenced Stan Gibson’s paper "Converting Legal and Contract Notices from Paper to Electronic Delivery: a Corporate Counsel Guide."
Stan Gibson was quoted in the Law360 article titled "Inventors Get 1st Dibs on Gov’t-Funded IP: High Court," regarding a recent Supreme Court decision on patent rights in federally funded inventions.
